Gyorgy Andor
​Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary, Institution of the first author, 1053 Egyetem tΓ©r 1–3. Budapest, Hungary
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31410/EMAN.2018.23


2nd International Scientific Conference – EMAN 2018 – Economics and Management: How to Cope With Disrupted Times, Ljubljana – Slovenia, March 22, 2018, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS published by: Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans, Belgrade, Serbia; Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia; Doba Business School – Maribor, Slovenia; Integrated Business Faculty – Skopje, Macedonia; Faculty of Management – Zajecar, Serbia, ISBN 978-86-80194-11-0


Abstract​

Income inequality progresses of five post-socialist countries currently members of the European Union (EU) from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) – the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia – are examined in this paper. The similar political and economic changes of these countries allow an integrated analysis of their income inequality developments. Moreover, as these countries represent a unique group around the border between high-income and upper-middle-income countries the paper can contribute also the debate of inequality problems in countries of different levels of economic development. The study focuses on the several relating and often contradictory theories and empirical evidences from the past few years trying to offer a comprehensive picture of progress if inequality of this region.
After a short introduction, the theories about the relationship between inequality and growth are summarized. Then the empirical evidences about income inequality in CEE countries are presented and also compared with EU-wide data. Finally, some concluding remarks close the paper.

Key words

inequality, economic growth, middle-income countries


References

Acemoglu, D., 2011. Thoughts on inequality and the financial crisis. In AEA meeting, Denver (Vol. 7).
Aghion, P., Caroli, E., & Garcia-Penalosa, C., 1999. Inequality and economic growth: the perspective of the new growth theories. Journal of Economic literature, 37(4), 1615-1660.
Alesina, A., & Rodrik, D., 1994. Distributive politics and economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 109(2), 465-490.
Bardhan, P., 2007. Poverty and inequality in China and India: Elusive link with globalisation. Economic and Political Weekly, 3849-3852.
Barro, R. J., 2000. Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries. Journal of economic growth, 5(1), 5-32.
Bertola, G., 1993. Market structure and income distribution in endogenous growth models. American Economic Review, 83(2), 1184-99.
Blau, F. D. and Kahn, L. M., 2009, β€˜Inequality and earnings distribution’, in Salverda, W., Nolan, B. and Smeeding, T. M. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic inequality, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Boushey H., 2011. The Endangered Middle Class: Is the American Dream Slipping out of Reach for American Families? Testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labour, and Pensions, May 12, 2011
Bubbico, R L and L Freytag, 2018. Inequality in Europe, European Investment Bank, January 2018.
Carvalho, L., & Rezai, A., 2015. Personal income inequality and aggregate demand. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(2), 491-505.
Corak, M. 2013. Income inequality, equality of opportunity, and intergenerational mobility. J. Econ. Perspect. 27, 79–102.
Dabla-Norris, M. E., Kochhar, M. K., Suphaphiphat, M. N., Ricka, M. F., & Tsounta, E., 2015. Causes and consequences of income inequality: a global perspective. International Monetary Fund.
Darvas, Z., 2016. Brexit vote boosts case for inclusive growth. Bruegel Blog Post. https://bruegel.org/2016/07/brexit-vote-boosts-case-forinclusive-growth/
Economist, 2016. The new wave – Globalisation and inequality, The Economist, Apr 2nd 2016
Forbes, K. J., 2000. A Reassessment of the Relationship between Inequality and Growth. American economic review, 869-887.
Inchauste, G. and J. Karver, 2018. Understanding Changes in Inequality in the EU Background to β€œGrowing United: Upgrading Europe’s Convergence Machine”, World Bank report 2018 January, World Bank Group
Krueger, A., 2012. The rise and consequences of inequality. Presentation made to the Center for American Progress, January 12th. Available at https://www. americanprogress. org/events/2012/01/12/17181/the-rise-and-consequences-of-inequality.
Milanovic, B., 2016. Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization, Harvard University Press.
Nolan, B., Roser, M. and Thewissen, S., 2016, GDP per capita versus median household income: What gives rise to divergence over time?, Oxford INET Working Paper Series, No. 2016-03.
Ostry, M. J. D., Berg, M. A., & Tsangarides, M. C. G., 2014. Redistribution, inequality, and growth. International Monetary Fund.
Persson, T., & Tabellini, G., 1994. Is inequality harmful for growth?. The American Economic Review, 600-621.
Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Harvard University Press, ISBN 9780674430006, April.
Piketty, T. and E. Saez, 2014. Inequality in the long run, Science 23 May 2014: Vol. 344 no. 6186 pp. 838-843.
Piketty, T. and G. Zucman, 2014. Capital is back: Wealth-income ratios in rich countries, 1700-2010. Q. J. Econ. 129, in press
Rajan, R. G., 2011. Fault lines: How hidden fractures still threaten the world economy. Princeton University Press.
Sachs, J. and Warner, A. M., 1996. Economic convergence and economic policies, NBER Working Paper No. 5039.
Solt, F, 2016, The Standardized World Income Inequality Database
Stiglitz, J. E., 2012. The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. WW Norton & Company.
Violante, G. L., 2008, β€˜Skill-biased technical change’, in Blume, L. and Durlauf, S. (eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, Palgrave Macmillan.
World Bank, 2016. Poverty and shared prosperity, taking on inequality.

Share this

Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans – UdEkoM Balkan
179 Ustanicka St, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

https://www.udekom.org.rs/home

Udekom Balkans is a dynamic non-governmental and non-profit organization, established in 2014 with a mission to foster the growth of scientific knowledge within the Balkan region and beyond. Our primary objectives include advancing the fields of management and economics, as well as providing educational resources to our members and the wider public.

Who We Are: Our members include esteemed university professors from various scientific disciplines, postgraduate students, and experts from ministries, public administrations, private and public enterprises, multinational corporations, associations, and similar organizations.

Building Bridges Together: Over the course of nine years since our establishment, the Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans has established impactful partnerships with more than 1,000 diverse institutions across the Balkan region and worldwide.

EMAN conference publications are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.